Letter from Victor Mair, Harvard University, to Angus Graham to invite him to join in a book of essays on Chuang-tzu. He informs Graham of other participants in the project and enquires when Graham's translation of the Chuang-tzu will be published.

Letter from Victor Mair, Harvard University, to Angus Graham to express his surprise at receiving Graham's essay far ahead of the deadline and his pleasure at its content.

Letter from Victor Mair, Harvard University, to Angus Graham to thank him for the revisions and to send some minor editorial changes.

Letter from Victor Mair, Harvard University, to Correspondent to inform of his change of address. There is an added note from Mair to inform Graham that he has received his letters.

Letter from Angus Graham to Victor Mair to inform that he hopes his translation of Chuang-tzu will be out in summer 1981 and, as such, he would like to also publish his other work on the Chuang-tzu. He asks, therefore for progress of Mair's publication and to remind of the prerogative Graham laid out to publish his essay elsewhere.

Letter from Angus Graham to Victor Mair to ask regarding the progress of the volume and to inform of his own publishing plans and attendance at the Chu Hsi conference in Honolulu.

Letter from Angus Graham to Victor Mair to acknowledge receipt of Mair's letters and to inform that he has sent the agreement form and biographical material.

The right to selfishness: Yangism, Later Mohism, Chuang Tzu by Angus Graham was published in Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, edited by Donald Munro, University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies, 1984. This material consists of a draft of the article and a letter concerning it.

What was new in the Ch'eng-Chu theory of human nature was published in Chu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism edited by Wing-tsit Chan, University of Hawaii Press, 1986, and reprinted in Studies of Early Chinese Philosophy. This material consists of correspondence from Wing-tsit Chan regarding the article.

The disputation of Kung-sun Lung as argument about whole and part was published in Philosophy East and West 36/2 (1986) and reprinted in Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy . This material consists of two drafts of the article: The disputation of Kung-sun Lung as argument about whole and part by Angus Graham, 37 pages. Kung-sun Lung tzu, photocopy, 9 pieces.