"Were there Chinese philosophers who distinguished the sentence from the name?" by A.C. Graham, - an article refuting Chad Hansen's rejection of this hypothesis as examined by Graham in Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science. Two copies, one typed with handwritten annotations, in English and Chinese, 5 pieces, one typed, 62 pieces which includes an "Appendix: The Separability and Distinguishability of Form and Content".

Partial draft of several chapters, the first of which is entitled "The Logic of the Mohist Hsiao-Ch'u".

Preface - Preface for Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, incomplete draft.

Letter from T.C. Lai, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, to Angus Graham to express his interest in Graham's manuscript, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science and to ask Graham to send it to him.

Letter from T.C. Lai, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, to Angus Graham to confirm approval for the manuscript and to ask concerning the specifics of printing.

Letter from R.F. Price, La Trobe University, Australia, to Angus Graham, to express his regret that they were unable to meet when Graham was in Melbourne. He writes of a recent hospitalisation when Graham's book on Mojia effectively took his mind off his body. He expresses how well the book was organised.

Letter from M.J. Daly, Publications Officer, SOAS, to Adrian Teng, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, to ask for further information regarding Graham's publication. With the letter is a compliment slip from the Publications Officer.

Letter from Christoph Harbsmeier to Angus Graham concerning Harbsmeier's relief on receiving Graham's letter concerning his review of Graham's book. He writes about points of disagreement on 'gu' and his unsurety regarding 'fan'.

Letter from Angus Graham to T.C. Lai to express his delight that the manuscript has been approved and to give some thoughts on layout and printing. With the letter are some notes on determining the location of sunrise and sunset.

Letter from Angus Graham to Christoph Harbsmeier to explain that he would be unable to write a review of Harbsmeier's book because of his poor grasp of German language. He then continues to further his argument concerning causation begun in the previous letter. With this letter is one from Christoph Harbsmeier to Diana Matias concerning editorial corrections for his new book and claiming that Graham had agreed to do a review.