Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes to thank for his letter of 25 June and return the signed cheque. He hopes Heffer will soon be able to bind the volumes required by Luzac.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes concerning the needed sheets and that there should be no difficulty in tracing them as they should bear the a label from Fleming, the printer, addressed to either Raynes or one of the trustees. He asks Raynes to check with Nicholson concerning where they were deposited. The letter is incomplete.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes in which he informs that Heffer have received the Persian facsimiles but he is not sure about the 'odd parcels' from Dow & Lester. They were not at Mill Lane when Storey checked the previous day. He asks Raynes to inform him of their whereabouts.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes to inform that he has no objection to the request from Princetown University Press for the reproduction of Sir Charles Lyall's translation of a poem. The other translation by Margoliouth is not from their publication and suggests it is Luzac to whom they should apply for permission. He also is in favour of sending Mr Ivanov the volumes he requests. He also writes that Heffer has informed him that some volumes are now stitched and wish to know whether they should be stored at the boathouse or in their own premises. Heffer has still failed to find some pages. Storey has supplied some further parcels which may contain some of the missing sheets.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes to inform Raynes that Heffer had taken a considerable number of the volumes required by Luzac. Cox & Allen do not seem to have returned the sheets which they folded some time ago. He informs that he has lent his own volumes to Heffer so they can see how the lettering should be. He suggests they try to get more 'odd parcels' from Dow & Lester.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes in which he informs, that after consideration, they should approach Heffer to carry out the work that Cox & Allen are unable to do, as Heffer may be able to get a special concession to obtain the binding materials. He further discusses the practicalities of getting the volumes to Heffer if they are willing to undertake the binding.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes to return the signed cheque and to comment on the variation in charges and ways to improve how the volumes are handled. He further adds in reply to Luzac's letter that it would help if they could inform the Trust of the priority for the Volumes they require and thus help the Trust in supplying them.

Letter from C.A. Storey to W.L. Raynes to thank him for the schedule of stock taken over by Dow & Lester in 1931 (possibly original of GMT/3/3/6). He writes concerning missing volumes and the parts that he has found. He agrees that they should ask Heffer regarding binding at contract rate and whether the numbers are sufficient to be considered contract. He also writes that he has asked Cox & Allen for proofs of Minorsky's work but is yet to receive them.

Letter from E. Denison Ross to C.A. Storey to inform him that at the trustees meeting held on 23 May, it was resolved that for the publication Hudud ud Alam, edited by Vladimir Minorsky, that apart from verbal corrections no further additions to the proofs be allowed and the work should be printed with an index of only the proper names. Denison Ross writes that on reporting this to Minorsky, he found that Minorsky had already created a more detailed index of his notes and commentary. Denison Ross and Professor Nicholson are soliciting the opinion of the trustees as to whether this increased index should be printed. Denison Ross gives an approximate estimate to the costs.

Letter from E.G. Raynes, Clerk to the Trust, to C.A. Storey to inform him that instructions have been given to send presentation copies of Kitāb al-Tashbīhāt to Drs Ritter and Bernhard Lewin as well as to the University Library, Uppsala. He writes that Professor Levy thinks the trustees will let Dr A. Mu'id Khan have ten copies and have instructed Raynes to arrange this. He also writes that the liquidators of the Central Uruguay Railway Company are liquidating their ordinary stock As a nominee, Raynes requires Storey's signature for the discharge (see GMT/2/2/49). He states that the questions of transferring stock into other names will be considered at the next Annual Meeting.