Showing 8773 results

Letter from Norris Pope, Senior Editor, Stanford University Press, to Angus Graham to inform Graham that they will not be proceeding with publishing his manuscript. He sends a copy of the reader's report (with the letter).

Letter from Norris Pope, Stanford University Press, to Angus Graham to state that his manuscript was with an outside reader.

Letter from Norris Pope, Stanford University Press, to Angus Graham to state that in connection with Reason and Spontaneity the reader had suggested Graham send an article to Ethics, Monist, or Philosophy.

Letter from Norris Pope, Stanford University Press, to Angus Graham to state that David Nivison had sent Graham's Reason and Spontaneity manuscript for which they are seeking an outside reader. They had found it rich, interesting and intelligent but have no expertise in the field.

Letter from Norman R. Seddon to Col. Hoysted, RAS Secretary, in which he thanks Hoysted for his letter with news of the Prize. He regrets he will not be in London as he is working in Baghdad and will only be returning to England if his Company decided to dispose with his services. Handwritten, dated 5 January 1934.

Letter from Norman Malcolm to Angus Graham concerning state of awareness as defined by Graham, and to inform him that he is writing a new paper on Wittgenstein. He also writes that he will be unable to attend the party.

Letter from Norman Malcolm, Sage School of Philosophy, Cornell University, to Angus Graham concerning Graham's paper on Awareness. He comments on his understanding of Graham's thesis with reference to Wittgenstein.

Letter from Norman [Malcolm] to Angus Graham concerning his paper on awareness, dated 1 March.

Letter from Norman J. Giradot to Angus Graham to thank Graham for his conviviality whilst Giradot was in London. He inquires as to whether Graham has found a publisher for his philosophy book and makes the suggestion of a series being published by Notre Dame University Press.

Letter from Norman [Girardot] to Angus Graham to state that Graham's paper might be of interest to current philosophy but that he is not sufficiently acquainted with the subject. He suggests potential journal for publications.