Showing 8773 results

Letter from Angus Graham to Adrian Teng, Publications Office, Chinese University of Hong Kong, in reply to Teng's letter concerning funding. Graham informs that he has passed the letter to his Publications Committee. With this letter is a copy of one that Graham sent to the SOAS Publications Committee.

Letter from Angus Graham to Adrian Teng, Publications Office, Chinese University of Hong Kong, to suggest that he flies to Hong Kong at his next vacation to sort any remaining problems face to face.

Letter from Angus Graham to Adrian Teng, Publications Office, Chinese University of Hong Kong, to re-present the facts concerning his possible visit.

Letter from Angus Graham to Adrian Teng, Publications Office, Chinese University of Hong Kong, to give his editorial comments on italics, indentations, quotations, printed area and section reference numbers.

Letter from Angus Graham to Arthur Danto to thank for his letter on Value, fact and facing fact. Graham expresses his disappointment that Danto has only provided stock answers.

Letter from Angus Graham to Betty Radice to send his Chuang-tzŭ manuscript which is complete apart from the preface, page references to texts quoted and an index of proper names. He writes that Chuang-tzŭ requires detailed textual notes but he may publish those through SOAS. The letter is an incomplete photocopy.

Letter from Angus Graham to Betty Radice, Penguin Books, to send a copy of his Chinese translations.

Letter from Angus Graham to Betty Radice, Penguin Books, to suggest that Arthur Waley is the most important reviewer for the book but warns of the difficulties he had with Waley's review of his The Book of Lieh-tzu. He also sends a page of references.

Letter from Angus Graham to Chad Hansen to inform Hansen that he had sent a review to JAS but he was doubtful they would publish it. With this letter is a copy of the review.

Letter from Angus Graham to Christoph Harbsmeier to argue his case to the interpretation he has included in the book and to raise other points concerning the Mohist canon.