Comments by David Hall on Graham's revisions to his paper on awareness.
Sem títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham to inform Graham of the part he plays in Hall's new novel and to make his comments on the Conceptual Schemes piece.
Sem títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham to send Graham a copy of Ben Schwartz's review of Graham's book and a copy of an article by Rotenstreich (article not with the letter). Hall expresses his opinion of the review and then encourages Graham to reconsider the idea of writing an autobiography.
Sem títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham to enclose some items he had forgotten to send (not with the letter). He writes that Ben Schwartz had called about his review which he hoped Graham would not find hostile.
Sem títuloComments by David Hall and questions raised after reading Graham's paper on awareness.
Sem títuloTwo reviews for Graham's Chuang-tzŭ: The Seven "Inner Chapters" and Other Writings from the Book Chuang-tzŭ.
Sem títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham concerning the title of the publication, The Rhyme of Reason.
Sem títuloFurther comments by David Hall and a letter from David Hall to Angus Graham to thank Graham for sending proposed revisions for an article and to further discuss the points raised by Graham. Graham has annotated some Chinese script on the reverse of one piece.
Sem títuloConceptual schemes and linguistic relativism in relation to Chinese was published in Synthesis Philosophica 4/2, 1989. It was subsequently reprinted in Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives, edited by Eliot Deutsch, University of Hawaii Press, 1991 and Epistemological Question in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul, University of New York Press, 1993. This material consists of drafts and correspondence regarding the article.
Sem títuloLetter from David L. Hall, Chairman, Philosophy Department, The University of Texas at El Paso, to Angus Graham to thank for sending the paper, "Value, Fact and Facing Fact". He continues that he was a reader of Reason and Spontaneity for Hawaii Press. He encloses his report and writes that he is willing to correspond regarding improving the manuscript.
Sem título