Much of the correspondence within the Graham papers is connected to his publications and activities and has therefore been catalogued in those series. This series contains those letters that do not easily fit into the other categories of the collection.
Sin títuloCorrespondence sent and received by Graham between 1985 and 1990.
Sin títuloStudies in Early Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature was published by the Institute for East Asian Philosophies (Singapore) in 1986 and by State University of New York Press (Albany) in 1990. This series contains some correspondence concerned with the publication of the book.
Sin títuloFour letters concerned with the publication of Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature.
Sin títuloLetter from William B. Eastman, Director, State University of New York Press, to Angus Graham regarding the publication of his collection of essays to be entitled Philosophy on the East-West Border. With the letter is a review and recommendation provided by David Hall on behalf of himself and Roger Ames.
Sin títuloDisputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China was published by Open Court (LaSalle IL) in 1989. This series consists of correspondence and reviews of the book.
Sin títuloCorrespondence concerned with the publication of Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China, mainly between Graham and the publishing house, Open Court.
Sin títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham to present his and Roger's comments on Graham's manuscript.
Sin títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham to send Graham a copy of Ben Schwartz's review of Graham's book and a copy of an article by Rotenstreich (article not with the letter). Hall expresses his opinion of the review and then encourages Graham to reconsider the idea of writing an autobiography.
Sin títuloLetter from David Hall to Angus Graham to enclose some items he had forgotten to send (not with the letter). He writes that Ben Schwartz had called about his review which he hoped Graham would not find hostile.
Sin título